PUBLIC CASE FILE / ACTUAL LOCAL RUNSOURCE-CHECKED

One paper. One generated note. Four ideas that keep working.

Open the unchanged paper, inspect PaperRoach's actual Markdown draft, compare the reviewed copy, and follow every derivative concept note. Nothing is hidden behind a screenshot.

Original PDF
2.09 MiB
Source length
14 pages
Processed note
generated + reviewed
Derivative notes
4 generated + 4 reviewed
01 / PROVENANCE

Follow the evidence, not a marketing screenshot.

Each artifact declares what came before it, what changed, and whether it has been checked against the source.

  1. Source01

    Unchanged article PDF

    The publisher-licensed PDF is copied byte-for-byte and checksummed.

    sha256:0104a812332e…
  2. Generate02

    Actual local output

    PaperRoach turns the PDF and metadata into one paper note and four concept drafts.

    *.generated.md × 5
  3. Review03

    Corrections stay visible

    The raw drafts remain available; formula, scope, and classification fixes live in sibling files.

    CHANGELOG.md
  4. Publish04

    Open files, not images

    PDF, Markdown, hashes, attribution, and changes all have direct public URLs.

    manifest.json + SHA256SUMS.txt
02 / ORIGINAL

Read the exact paper PaperRoach received.

This 2.09 MiB file is included unchanged. The first page carries the CC BY 4.0 notice, and the checksum matches the local source.

ORIGINAL / 14-PAGE PDF2,187,171 bytes

Your browser cannot embed the PDF here. Open the original PDF

The inline viewer is replaced by a lighter link on small screens.

Open the original PDF
03 / PROCESSED

See the machine draft and the reviewed note side by side.

The generated file only redacts a local path and internal ID. The public copy corrects documented errors without erasing the original output.

REVIEWED MARKDOWN / DEFAULT READING COPYpaper-note.md
04 / DERIVED

A paper becomes a small, inspectable knowledge graph.

Expand each branch for a rendered summary, then open either the reviewed concept or the publication-sanitized generated draft.

DERIVED FROM PAPER NOTE

Affective expression on social media

Four Obsidian wikilinks became standalone concept files.

C-01Affective Dynamics Model

Reviewed definitionA two-component model for baseline-centered expressed valence and arousal: an instantaneous expression-associated adjustment plus continuous mean reversion.

Source evidencePooled fit over 16,863,066 consecutive status-update pairs.

C-02Exponential Relaxation

Reviewed definitionA mean-reverting process whose distance from an individual baseline shrinks by an exponential factor over time.

Source evidenceArousal relaxed faster than valence in the fitted model.

C-03Individual Baseline

Reviewed definitionA person's long-run average expressed valence or arousal in the analyzed status updates.

Source evidenceAggregate means were 5.88 for valence and 4.13 for arousal on 1–9 scales.

C-04Regulation Effect

Reviewed definitionThe model's immediate proportional movement of baseline-centered expression toward zero, represented by k.

Source evidenceThe fitted values were kᵥ = 0.38 and kₐ = 0.45.

05 / FILES

Every public artifact, size, and checksum.

The browser loads this inventory from the same manifest that tools can consume. Open any file directly.

Loading manifest…

  1. source
    Original article PDForiginal/pellert-et-al-2020.pdf
    2.09 MiBsha256:0104a812332e… Open ↗
  2. generated
    Actual generated paper noteprocessed/paper-note.generated.md
    Markdownmanifest Open ↗
  3. reviewed
    Source-checked paper noteprocessed/paper-note.md
    Markdownmanifest Open ↗
06 / LICENSE & REVIEW

Reuse is allowed. Attribution and changes travel with it.

The paper's license permits sharing and adaptation when credit, the license link, and change notice are supplied.